Spread the love
A 15% tax on all imported fuel, and suddenly, the President of the United States is “ready” to deploy military forces to Nigeria, over a false genocide allegation. And I somehow believe this is one out of many reasons why threats are being issued.
But one thing I know for sure is that whatever threat Trump is issuing isn’t about human rights or genocide, it’s about leverage. What many don’t understand is that politics at that level is never random, every move is calculated to create pressure, fear, and confusion, which are the perfect atmosphere for negotiation.
When you stire tension and paint Nigeria as unstable, that’s you trying to weaken the country’s bargaining power and force a leveled ground where any eventual dialogue or deal will tilt in favor of your own political and economic agenda. It’s an old playbook, create chaos, pretend to offer help, and then dictate the terms of peace.
This is about control, power, and economic interest. Nigeria in recent times have been taking bold steps, one that disrupts the profit chain, and trade flows of a few global players, and suddenly, false narratives and threats began flying.
Every time an African nation tries to rise, to assert its independence, or to build something that benefits its people rather than the foreign giants, there’s always a story, a scandal, a sanction, or a sudden concern for democracy. It’s the same script, just rewritten for a new country.
A self-reliant Africa is bad business for those who have fed off her dependence for decades.
And what’s even more painful is that some Nigerians are cheering this madness, celebrating the possibility of foreign troops on our soil, all because they hate the president. Phoolish set of people who are too blinded by politics to see the danger.
No foreign nation truly fights your battles out of love. Every intervention has a price. Every help comes with a hidden clause, and once they step in militarily, they don’t leave until they’ve taken what they came for, influence, dominance or obedience.
Look at Libya, look at Iraq, look at Afghanistan. Once flourishing nations reduced to ashes under the disguise of “protection.” Decades later, they’re still trying to recover. Is that what you want for Nigeria?
So before you join the chorus of chaos online, ask yourself: What’s really at stake? Because behind every headline of “concern,” there’s always a hidden hand of control.
And one thing is certain, when the dust settles, it’s never the foreign powers that suffer, it’s the citizens who must rebuild from the ruins.

Dividing Black Africa: Trump vs Nigeria – Soyinka’s Visa and Dangote’s Mega Refinery. What Does America Really Want?

By abijohn.com

As global power shifts toward Africa’s booming economies, Nigeria — the continent’s beating heart — finds itself once again in the middle of a silent tug-of-war between ambition and influence. With the U.S. reasserting its presence under a revived Trump-era strategy and China tightening its grip on trade and infrastructure, one question echoes through Africa’s corridors of power:


What does America really want from Nigeria?

The Return of a Divided Strategy

From Washington to Lagos, the signals are becoming clearer. America’s Africa policy — once clothed in the language of aid and democracy — now looks more like a strategic containment plan. A new scramble for influence is underway, this time not for land or gold, but for control of African independence itself.

While the world celebrates Africa’s technological and industrial growth, the U.S. quietly worries about losing its leverage. Nigeria’s push toward self-reliance — symbolized by Dangote’s giant refinery — threatens decades of Western economic dominance rooted in crude oil exports and dependency.

Soyinka’s Visa: Symbolism of Subtle Power

When Nobel Laureate Wole Soyinka, one of Nigeria’s most respected voices, was recently denied a U.S. visa, it sparked outrage and suspicion among intellectuals and diplomats alike. Soyinka, a man who has spent decades building bridges between Africa and the West, found himself shut out by the same country that once celebrated his brilliance.

This wasn’t just a bureaucratic blunder. To many observers, it was a political signal — a reminder that America still chooses who gets access and whose voices are amplified on the global stage.
How could the U.S. — a nation that preaches free speech — deny entry to one of Africa’s most outspoken champions of democracy?

To Nigeria’s elite, the message was clear: cultural respect and political approval from Washington are privileges, not rights. In contrast, nations that play ball economically often enjoy smooth diplomatic passage. The timing of Soyinka’s visa denial, just as Nigeria begins flexing industrial independence, feels far from accidental.

Dangote’s Refinery: The New African Power Symbol

Meanwhile, Aliko Dangote’s $20 billion refinery has shifted Africa’s energy map. Designed to refine up to 650,000 barrels of oil per day, it positions Nigeria not just as an exporter of raw crude, but as a regional supplier of refined fuel — a role once dominated by Western refineries.

That single development could cut billions in fuel import costs, strengthen the naira, and reposition Nigeria as the engine of a new African industrial revolution. But not everyone is cheering.

For Western oil interests, Dangote’s refinery represents economic independence — and lost leverage. A self-sufficient Nigeria disrupts traditional trade patterns that kept African economies tethered to Western processing plants. For Washington, that’s a power shift worth slowing down — through trade pressure, technical bottlenecks, or even diplomatic distractions.

Divide, Distract, and Dominate

The U.S. strategy has always balanced praise and pressure. Applaud democracy, but punish independence. Celebrate African artists and intellectuals, while quietly obstructing their countries’ sovereignty.
By denying Soyinka a visa while scrutinizing Dangote’s rise, America signals that cultural approval and economic freedom are not to be enjoyed simultaneously.

Trump’s renewed rhetoric about “fair trade” with Africa hides a more familiar motive: keep Africa open for U.S. interests, but closed to full autonomy. Nigeria, with its rising middle class, global influence, and energy capacity, threatens that balance more than any other African nation.

What Does America Really Want?

The answer lies in the intersection of soft power and hard economics. America doesn’t want Nigeria to fail — it wants Nigeria to need America. A divided Black Africa ensures the West remains the referee, the lender, and the gatekeeper.

Soyinka’s denied visa is not just about travel documents. It’s a metaphor for how the West still controls who enters the global conversation — and who gets silenced.
Dangote’s refinery, on the other hand, is the opposite symbol: of access, autonomy, and African pride.

The tension between these two men — one of words, one of industry — mirrors the battle for Africa’s future. Will Nigeria stand united in defining its destiny, or will old powers succeed in dividing it again under new slogans?

The world is watching.
And so is Washington.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

While viewing the website, tap in the menu bar. Scroll down the list of options, then tap Add to Home Screen.
Use Safari for a better experience.